So you dont actually have any constructive reason why this is a bad idea then?
Hurrah for Britdisc, "It makes it easier for us to tell who the ****s are"
as I believe the phrase was at least once this season...
At 08:11 16/09/2006, some twat wrote:
On 15/09/06, Mitchell, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Finally,
should there be a limit on squad sizes at tournaments next year? > Having
slightly smaller squads (say a limit of 16) might reward playing > ability
over sheer weight of numbers. It may also increase standards all > through
the Tour and stop people complaining about not having enough games. > Just
a thought. How about making The Tour ironman, with hundreds of
back-to-back games? Then it would reward fitness as well as playing
ability and separate the wheat from the chaff. The men from the boys. We
can take up the baton of endurance sport what Pheidippides allegedly
started [1 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marathon>] and La Première Tour
(cycling) continued. We are on the cusp of something truly great. Dean. ps
How about 24 hour, floodlit? Scrub that: 36. I'm on a roll here. [1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maratho
__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ranulf.net/mailman/listinfo/britdisc
Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/informed.asp
__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ranulf.net/mailman/listinfo/britdisc
Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/informed.asp
