It would be interesting to see a worldwide poll on some of the questions and 
issues raised during the MLA debate. I think this would be something that the 
WFDF should be doing. It has to be done well otherwise the results are useless. 
Russ put some good questions below and Tom had some good questions as well:

1. Is Spirit of the Game a good theory that is actually not really followed 
towards the end of a tournament or at other times?
2. Is it possibly a relief to sometimes be able to rely on others to make 
calls? (OK, ultimate Cardinal Sin to even pose the question)
3. Is it OK to not be absolute about SOTG or referees, but be flexible to the 
scenario?
4. Is ultimate like church for some people, with fellowship, activities  and 
congregation on weekends, culminating in a "Sunday Service" ergo the tournament 
final that everyone sits down and feels compelled to watch? (OK, this question 
is less serious, but an interesting observation, nonetheless)
5. Do people defend ultimate rules like people defend church dogma? (maybe a 
little and maybe not)

I am not saying that all these questions should be asked, all I am saying is 
that I think the WFDF should step up and take the global temperature and see 
where we stand. If it turns out that we stand were I think we stand (most 
Ultimate players will not accept refs etc...) then how can we protect what we 
consider Ultimate in the long run? As Valerio wrote: Ultimate is a team sport 
with three fundamental characteristics: a disc, self-arbitration, and 
non-contact. Changing any one of these key elements makes it a completely 
different sport.

Jonathan (our new WFDF president) are you listening? This is more important to 
the sport than figuring our doping policies.

Keep 'em flying y'all!

Patrick

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Russ Bousfield
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 1:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BD] MLU

Thanks Brummie et al, for all the useful and valid comments made during the 
course of this debate (it's been a lot more enjoyable than the usual pie-fights 
over pitch-side water...).

Has anyone ever thought about setting up a quick online poll to gauge the wider 
opinion on this contentious Britdisc/Eurodisc debate? I for one would find it 
useful to capture the feelings of the wider Ultimate population (the readers of 
Britdisc/Eurodisc, not just the posters)?

Apoll would not be an attempt to prevent or support anyone doing what they want 
to do with regards to running tournaments with different rule-sets. Everyone 
should be free to play whatever form of the game they wish. This is just done 
partly out of curiosity and also partly to help others to make decisions on 
future evolutions of the game, hopefully for the benefit of all. Of course, it 
would also only be a further (but wider) gauge of OPINION.

Some suggestions for questions (based around the most contentious issues raised 
in this interesting and enjoyable debate):

1. Would you want an active referee to be present in your Ultimate games at a 
competitive level? (YES/NO)
2. Does Ultimate with active refereeing make the game more appealing/enjoyable 
for spectators? (YES/NO)
3. If elite players play their competitive games with active refereeing, how 
does that impact your perception of Ultimate? (Positively/Negatively/No change)
4. If elite players play their competitive games with active refereeing, how 
would you believe that would impact the public perception of Ultimate? 
(Positively/Negatively/No change)
5. Is active refereeing in conflict with the Spirit Of The Game? (YES/NO)
6. Should a game with active refereeing still be considered (and named) 
Ultimate? (YES/NO) 
7. How would you describe your Ultimate playing level? (1-5, 5=National player, 
1=beginner having played a handful of tournaments) 
8. (Just out of interest) Where you play most of your competitive Ultimate? 
(UK/Mainland Europe/USA/Other)

Russ.




________________________________
From: Sion Scone <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 January, 2009 9:47:16 PM
Subject: [BD] MLU

I was so incensed by some of the utter c...@p being written that I
actually signed back up to BritDisc... suppose this means I'll end up
having another argument with Grayson and Jaimie.;-)

Firstly - MLU is not a new concept. See
http://ultivillage.com/index.php/Tournament-Series/2006-major-league-ultimate-mlu-dvd.
Watch the trailer. Hell, buy it, its only $13. It's a *fun*
experiment to try some of the things that Dale, Jacko etc have
mentioned; to make the game faster and appeal more to an audience.

It is ultimate. Its just a different type. Same way that beach,
indoors (*spits on the floor*), mini, etc are all a variation on the
real game. And its not going to destroy the sport you love either. I
can't really believe that people who play ultimate, a blatantly hippie
sport thats only been around for 30ish years, would be so against
another new style of play.

As for the discussion about playing vs watching: as far as I'm aware,
no-one has actually played it yet. I expected better really...
prejudice isn't the kind of thing I'd expect from the Ultimate
community.

As for the debate about Spirit...

Derryk makes the best point of all. It is a sad fact that there are
people who blatantly cheat. If you haven't had the pleasure of
playing against them, or seeing it for yourself, you should watch the
BlockStack episode featuring Ireland v Venezuela. Imagine working
hard for years to achieve something and being beaten by blatant
cheating. Without stooping to the same level, how do you combat it?
I can testify that it made WUGC a much sadder tournament for me than I
was hoping it would be.

How about just the simple fact that SOTG is interpreted differently by
everyone; how calls are managed at a beginners indoor tournament, a
fun beach tournament, student nationals or EUCF are all very, very
different. Each nation tends to have a slightly different bias too
(there was a big discussion about this on EuroDisc, check the archive
if you like). For instance, more North American teams will accept
more contact, Europeans less. A lot of Americans who move to Europe
have to change their style of play to be less physical; the aggressive
style of marking that is prevalent in the States (I can testify to
this having played there) would be interpreted as "unspirited" in
Europe. But its simply a different interpretation of the same text.
Of course, this doesn't mean that there aren't teams in Europe who
will cheat (I can think of at least 3 major offenders).

Fortunately, in MLU fouls are treated as a tactical part of the game.
If you buy that dvd I mentioned - you should - you'll see a bit where
one player uses one of his fouls tactically to prevent an easy goal.
The referees applied the correct punishment and play continued. So
while you might see a few, really blatant tactical fouls, its all part
of the game; and very well-natured in fact between two players who
both knew the foul was blatant (he just hugged him to prevent a throw,
nothing dangerous). Its much better than being constantly grabbed by
your defender, them clawing at the disc you're trying to throw, etc -
all common when you play GOAT, Chain Lightning, etc.

As for referees: I don't think we need them in ultimate. I'd like to
have observers sometimes... but I've never played with either
observers or referees. I'd certainly give it a try in an experiment
like MLU.

If you don't like it - don't play it. It won't affect ultimate in any
way, shape or form. Its just a one-off experiment. So just chill.

Brummie

p.s. no-one should ever give Si Weeks a whistle.

__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fysh.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/britdisc
Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/staying-informed
__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fysh.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/britdisc
Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/staying-informed




__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fysh.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/britdisc
Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/staying-informed

Reply via email to