Hello all,
First of all, i would like to express my gratitude to the BRL-CAD
organisation for accepting my proposal. It gives me immense pleasure to
participate as a part of BRL-CAD in GSoC.
Second of all, i wanted to know if we are to go forward with the portable
module for mesh healing along with OpenSCAD. I will edit my proposal and
abstract accordingly. After talking to kintel on the IRC, it is now clear
that: geometry storage and geometry processing can be done with different
data structures. BRL-CAD's rt_bot_internal structure contains attributes
such as vertices, faces, normals, etc. explicitly, while the OpenSCAD
Polyset class contains a vector of vector of 3D vectors as a set of
polygons. So, the geometry storage structure can be similar to that of
BRL-CAD's (OpenSCAD's Polygons type in the Polyset class can be converted
to this). Yet to decide on a structure for geometry processing (that can
accommodate meshes with topological defects and holes). Opinions welcome.
Regards,
Rakshika.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
