[email protected] (2025/05/06 08:01 -0400): > Well more a Braille framework rather than a goal. It could be based on > BRLTTY but it is hard to create the same kind of access since the BRLTTY has > a one to one corispondence to a console based app. GUI's have objects and > they can be anything. It doesn't map one to one and will probably take more > thought to get right than any know.
One building block that I have already discussed with a few other persons here is a braille toolkit that defines how to display widgets in braille. > The reason Jaws and NVDA are the way > they are is because they have come as close as any have been willing to > define a true Braille interface. I am not sure I understand you properly here, but if you are saying that what NDVA produces in terms of braille is good, I for myself remain unconvinced. I have no experience with Jaws but my impression regarding NDVA is that it is a speech-sysnthesis centered screen reader where braille is treated more as a complement to the speech synthesis than a first class citizen. To me, even the word "screen *reader*" suggests what I'd call a bias towards speech sysnthesis. _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://brltty.app/mailman/listinfo/brltty
