Well more a Braille framework rather than a goal. It could be based on BRLTTY but it is hard to create the same kind of access since the BRLTTY has a one to one corispondence to a console based app. GUI's have objects and they can be anything. It doesn't map one to one and will probably take more thought to get right than any know. The reason Jaws and NVDA are the way they are is because they have come as close as any have been willing to define a true Braille interface.
-----Original Message----- From: BRLTTY <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Samuel Thibault Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 7:02 AM To: Informal discussion between users and developers of BRLTTY. <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [BRLTTY] Footsteps towards better accessibility in Linux [email protected], le mar. 06 mai 2025 06:44:42 -0400, a ecrit: > The problem is there would need to be a defined goal. Indeed, and the problem is that it's not just a goal more precise than "make accessibility work", which means fixing a lot of small things here and there. Samuel _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://brltty.app/mailman/listinfo/brltty _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://brltty.app/mailman/listinfo/brltty
