高生旺, le Tue 03 Feb 2009 10:55:45 +0800, a écrit :
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > The result of the discussion is that there is no standard translationsetc.  
> > People from [email protected] recommended to just take 
> > existingdictionaries (e.g. those references in unihan.txt) and plug them in.
> I think that unihan.txt is too large. The ideal way is only fetch English 
> definitions for standard,

Oh yes for sure.  I never intended to include all of unihan, just what
we need :)

Samuel
_______________________________________________
This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list.
To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected]
For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty

Reply via email to