Darren Reed writes:
> I installed snv106 and started to play around with crossbow.
> I was using inside a virtual host and then with a reboot,
> my vnic0 doesn't appear. The standard commands can't see it.
> A question to crossbow-discuss goes largely unanswered.
> Now if I translate that to working in an office, using Solaris
> for some production environment, the it is like that Sun's
> support is of no help and it's up to me to find out what the
> problem is and fix it.

We already expose all of our internal details in both the source code
and the internal design and other documentation we publish.  These
things aren't hidden.

Thus, I *think* you're suggesting more.  You seem to be suggesting
that condoning administrative tweeking of undocumented interfaces
might be a way to help out poor admins who are saddled with lousy
support from Sun.

I think that's wrong on multiple fronts.  First of all, we shouldn't
have lousy support at all, and I think it's important to make sure
that bad support experiences just don't happen.

If the place you asked your question (the project team mailing list)
really is the right place to get customer support, and you didn't get
the expected level of support there, then that's a problem that needs
to be fixed right away.  Make sure you tell someone in charge of
support about your problem, and get the support problem fixed so that
customers don't stumble over it.  If that wasn't the right place to
ask for customer support (I suspect it may not have been), then I
think you didn't follow the support process.  Yelling at the toaster
might not fix the coffee maker.

There just shouldn't be any cases where customers are out in the cold,
trying to figure out why something deep in the bowels of the system is
broken.  That's why we test things before shipping them, and why we
employ support people.

Secondly, I think you're on a slippery slope here.  Just how much
should we twist system architecture to match undocumented use?  Should
we rule out the use of SMF and require plain text files for all
service configuration instead?

That seems like a high price to pay in order to help out
administrators who are doing things they shouldn't need to do in the
first place.

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

Reply via email to