On (03/03/09 02:06), Peter Memishian wrote: > > I noticed that all Brussels based drivers are using PRIV_SYS_NET_CONFIG, > but according to privileges(5), PRIV_SYS_DL_CONFIG is the privilege > necessary to "configure a system's datalink interfaces". Given that > PRIV_SYS_NET_CONFIG includes PRIV_SYS_DL_CONFIG I guess it doesn't matter > too much, but is this intentional? As it stands, there are just a few > lonely wifi drivers using PRIV_SYS_DL_CONFIG. >
it's not intentional. AFAIK, this was inherited as part of the merge with PSARC 2008/473 (CR 6695904). Maybe Seb has some insights? --Sowmini
