On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 06:35 -0500, Sowmini.Varadhan at Sun.COM wrote: > On (03/03/09 02:06), Peter Memishian wrote: > > > > I noticed that all Brussels based drivers are using PRIV_SYS_NET_CONFIG, > > but according to privileges(5), PRIV_SYS_DL_CONFIG is the privilege > > necessary to "configure a system's datalink interfaces". Given that > > PRIV_SYS_NET_CONFIG includes PRIV_SYS_DL_CONFIG I guess it doesn't matter > > too much, but is this intentional? As it stands, there are just a few > > lonely wifi drivers using PRIV_SYS_DL_CONFIG. > > > > it's not intentional. AFAIK, this was inherited as part of the merge > with PSARC 2008/473 (CR 6695904). Maybe Seb has some insights?
My insights aren't too surprising, this bug should be fixed. :-) -Seb
