> > > I noticed that all Brussels based drivers are using PRIV_SYS_NET_CONFIG, > > > but according to privileges(5), PRIV_SYS_DL_CONFIG is the privilege > > > necessary to "configure a system's datalink interfaces". Given that > > > PRIV_SYS_NET_CONFIG includes PRIV_SYS_DL_CONFIG I guess it doesn't matter > > > too much, but is this intentional? As it stands, there are just a few > > > lonely wifi drivers using PRIV_SYS_DL_CONFIG. > > > > > > > it's not intentional. AFAIK, this was inherited as part of the merge > > with PSARC 2008/473 (CR 6695904). Maybe Seb has some insights? > > My insights aren't too surprising, this bug should be fixed. :-)
:-) I've filed 6812813 for this. -- meem
