> > Another would be to have all IP interface > configuration stored in a single service instance's properties, perhaps > with each interface's configuration in its own property group. It all > depends on what the requirements are. >
I was thinking the same. Above model would just work fine if we want to use libscf.so/svc.configd to just store the interface configurations and not represent any of the IP interfaces as SMF instance(s). > Certainly, moving the configuration to SCF doesn't require representing > individual IP interfaces as service instances but is it OK, to just have one aspect of SMF (configuration part) and not have any instances of the service which represent the configuration i. e. use SMF's configuration framework and not use SMF's service management (start, stop, refresh) framework. ~Girish -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/brussels-dev/attachments/20090305/02a87749/attachment.html>
