On (10/31/08 10:20), Peter Memishian wrote: > Before we go about building this into ipadm, I'd repeat my request for > some analysis to be done about the administrative actions/objects at the > transport level. Erik has asserted that it's just tunables, and I hope > he's right, but I think some more investigation is needed before going too > far down this road. In particular, there may be some things modeled as > tunables only because we had no alternative, and other requests floating > around the bug database or wedged into other commands for similar reasons. > (I'm not asking for a life's work here, just due diligence.)
I can, and will, re-verify, of course, but the cases where we have found misfits in the "tunable" list are being placed into more appropriate locations- e.g., tcp_host_param (see CR 6737341) or the replacement of tcp_trace by dtrace probes. --Sowmini
