On (10/30/08 13:00), Darren Reed wrote: > > If that is the case then "ipadm" is named incorrectly. > netadm/transadm or ipadm/tcpadm/udpadm/... >
I don't want to get too caught up in the nomenclature here, but my own initial instinct, like Jim's, was to club all of it under ipadm. However, as becomes evident with property management in comparison with the other commands considered, it *is* true that the transport layer does not usually target IP interfaces, just as the IP layer does not target transport layer ports. It was for this reason that I split the tools into "ipadm" (or "netadm" or "l3adm"??) and transadm (or "xadm" or "ulpadm" or "l4adm"??). but what do we want to see these tools doing? Any comments about the suggested features? --Sowmini
