> > Seems fine to me. Regarding the `name' parameter to > > mac_register_priv_prop(): I presume the caller will not provide the `_', > > Yes. the driver will be written to be consistent with dladm's > private property expectations. the mac_ndd shim will add/delete > the "_" to deal with ND_SET/ND_GET ioctls.
I see. So will dladm be able to interact with these properties? Based on some of the earlier emails in this thread, it seemed like you felt that was unnecessary (and I tend to agree), but I don't see anything in the spec that prevents it. Maybe a MAC_NDD_PROP flag to mac_register_priv_prop()? -- meem
