Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am 17.08.2006 um 17:51 schrieb David Kastrup: > >> Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Am 17.08.2006 um 16:04 schrieb David Kastrup: >>> >>>> Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> >>>>> Hello! >>>>> >>>>> I can't see an option to change the built-in viewer name to >>>>> something more reasonable, for example texdoc. The previous >>>>> version had such an option. >>>> >>>> The builtin viewer for what? >>>> >>> >>> I didn't see any built-in viewer, >> >> For what? When doing what? > > I don't know. You introduced this built-in viewer which never > introduced to me.
Please read what you wrote above, right below "Hello!". >>> and it never showed up for me. There was always xpdf or xdvi opened >>> without my explicite wish. The only reasonable choice is texdoc, of >>> course! >> >> Last time I looked, texdoc could not deal with source specials and had >> special search paths wired in. >> >> Did you take a look at >> >> (info "(auctex) Viewing") >> ^ Press C-x C-e here >> > > No. I instantly thought of customising since I knew what I am > wishing and what works, with or without special paths or > applications to handle a particular file format. That's the great > advantage: make it right once, and save time on the bug-auctex list! I am afraid that I don't get your point. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
