On Thu, Aug 17 2006, David Kastrup wrote:
> Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Am 17.08.2006 um 20:34 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>> The "built-in viewer name," an obvious synonym
It's not obvious at all.
>>>> for something pre-defined to be used as an application to display
>>>> some output from TeX
So you mean the *.dvi or *.pdf file and the dvi- or pdf-viewer?
>>>> (is my writing so bad?).
Sorry, at least David and me don't seem to get it.
>>>> And there does not seem to be an option to customise the
>>>> inconvenient setting.
Which setting?
,----[ Output of `TeX-submit-bug-report' ]
| Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
| what in fact did happen.
`----
>> Yes. It states this incorrect opinion:
>>
>> For PDF output, forward search is availabe when using the pdfsync
>> LaTeX package and xpdf as PDF viewer. With the pdfsync package forward
>> search does not rely on source specials. [...]
>>
>> Pdfsync works with TeXShop, TeXniscope, and iTeXMac. I never heard
>> of anything else ...
Last time I tried (shortly before the release of 11.83), it worked
with xpdf.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
