Hi Mosè, Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes:
>> 2017-03-08 20:43 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati <[email protected]>: >> > have you been writing many tables lately? ;-) Tough luck, really! I did exactly one table, with side effects ;-) >> My suggest to guard (- (current-column) 1) with a (wholenump ...) and >> return (+ 2 beg-col) as fallback if the test is not true: > > Yeah, a fallback option in case we get non-sense result is always > useful. Alas, `wholenump' is not available in XEmacs. Thanks for the heads-up, I will replace it with (if (< (- (current-column) 1) 0) (+ 2 beg-col) (- (current-column) 1)) > Remember also the test! Yes, will do. Best, Arash _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
