Hi Arash,
> I've just pushed a change with `natnump' to git.
I'm afraid that the fix has to be reconsidered. The current code does
not work as expected when the whole tabular environment itself is
indented like the following examples.
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
\multicolumn{2}{c}{These lines will} `M-RET here'
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\begin{table}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
\multicolumn{2}{c}{These lines will} \\
& `C-c C-q C-e here'
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
So it is not sufficient to examine whether `(- (current-column) 1)' is
negative or not. I suppose that comparing the `(current-column)' and
`beg-col' would be necessary. (Or just using `(max (- (current-column)
1) (+ 2 beg-col))' might be sufficient. I haven't considered the
situation in detail yet.)
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
