Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes:
> Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> I'm afraid that the fix has to be reconsidered.
>
> And I was afraid that this would happen; it seemed just too easy ;-)
>
>> The current code does not work as expected when the whole tabular
>> environment itself is indented like the following examples.
>>
>> \begin{table}
>> \begin{tabular}{ll}
>> \multicolumn{2}{c}{These lines will} `M-RET here'
>> \end{tabular}
>> \end{table}
>>
>> \begin{table}
>> \begin{tabular}{ll}
>> \multicolumn{2}{c}{These lines will} \\
>> & `C-c C-q C-e here'
>> \end{tabular}
>> \end{table}
>>
>> So it is not sufficient to examine whether `(- (current-column) 1)' is
>> negative or not. I suppose that comparing the `(current-column)' and
>> `beg-col' would be necessary. (Or just using `(max (- (current-column)
>> 1) (+ 2 beg-col))' might be sufficient. I haven't considered the
>> situation in detail yet.)
>
> Thank you very much for double checking. I think I won't revert my last
> change; it fixes at least part of the problem. I will also think about
> it again (but your suggestion above looks quite appealing to me).
Hi Keita,
I did some testing, your suggestion with
(if (natnump (- (current-column) 1))
(max (+ 2 beg-col)
(- (current-column) 1))
(+ 2 beg-col))
seems to do the job. Do you have any other idea?
Best, Arash
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
