Hi Al,

>>>>> Al Haji-Ali <[email protected]> writes:
> On 02/10/2025, Al Haji-Ali wrote:
>> This patch (last one before preview-point implementation) refactors
>> code for creating and starting preview processes.

> @Arash, @Ikumi, please let me know if there's anything I can do to
> make reviewing this patch easier (like splitting or joining changes).

Sorry for further delay, I've been laid up with a terrible cold since
Sunday night, and I've finally managed to get back to reviewing.

Your proposal basically looks good to me and I think we can accept it.
There is one minor concern: why do you treat dvisvgm as if it were a
variant of dvipng? It seems more intuitive to introduce
`preview-dvisvgm-process-setup', `preview-start-dvisvgm' etc.

-(defun preview-dvipng-process-setup ()
-  "Set up dvipng process for conversion."
+(defun preview-dvi*-process-setup-1 (img-type start sentinel)
+  "Setup process of a DVI converter to IMG-TYPE.
+START is the function that actually starts the process and SENTINEL is
+the used `TeX-sentinel-function'."

The last sentence seems to lack a word between "the" and "used" (and
possibly "by" is also missing?)

Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
#Gaza #StopGenocide #CeasefireNOW



_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex

Reply via email to