> If you'd like to augment the test suite where you feel it lacks something, > please feel free to do so.
tests were included in my patch. you deleted them. i think they should be added in. > are there any tests that cover the variable modifiers, either unit tests > or > > functional tests? > Yes. The test framework and tests are available for you to see. my question was whether you have tests for the variable modifiers. i don't see any. that's the area of code i was touching, and that's why i wrote a few tests of that area. On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote: > On 3/7/18 1:00 PM, don fong wrote: > > Chet Ramey wrote: > >> What are the most important features that you consider to lack > unit tests? > > > > are there any tests that cover the variable modifiers, either unit tests > or > > functional tests? > > Yes. The test framework and tests are available for you to see. They're all > tests of shell behavior, since what concerns most people is shell behavior. > If you'd like to augment the test suite where you feel it lacks something, > please feel free to do so. I'm not interested in adding a new testing > framework. > > -- > ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer > ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates > Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/ >
