On 3/9/18 3:14 AM, don fong wrote: > > my question was whether you have tests for the variable modifiers. > i don't see any. that's the area of code i was touching, and that's why i > wrote a few tests of that area.
Thank you for the inspiration. I ran the devel version of the test suite through gcov, added some tests, and was able to increase the coverage of subst.c (the word expansion code, plus) from 83% to 86%. It's tough to get it higher than that due to the functions that exist only for readline support and the debugging and system call error-handling code. Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/