[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> The description of wc's --files0-from is nearly identical
>> to that of du. I've added an example:
>> ...
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> +find . -name '*.[ch]' -print0 | ./wc -L --files=- | tail -n1
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] example
>
> Here you are using the substring abbreviation --files for
> --files0-from. Which is fine. But what if someday the --files-from
> option is added? My preference would be to make the example be unique
> in that case too and to use at least --files0=- there.
...
Good point.
I've spelled it out:
* coreutils.texi (wc invocation): Spell out `--files0-from' in
the example. Suggestion from Bob Proulx.
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
