Eric Blake wrote: ... > I did, but it was an old enough machine that -lacl wasn't present, so > configure disabled the attempt to do that link in the first place. Sorry > about that.
No harm. >> diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am >> index ed7cc86..aee904f 100644 >> --- a/src/Makefile.am >> +++ b/src/Makefile.am >> @@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ su_LDADD += $(LIB_CRYPT) >> # for various ACL functions >> copy_LDADD += $(LIB_ACL) >> dir_LDADD += $(LIB_ACL) >> +ls_LDADD += $(LIB_ACL) > > Hmm. dir_LDADD is a no-op - it was previously assigned to be identical to Yes. Incrementing dir_LDADD here is a no-op. > whatever the final ls_LDADD ends up being (ie. my bug was using dir_LDADD > instead of the correct ls_LDADD). Therefore, should I also apply this > patch (just a diff for now)? > > diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am > index b4ff8da..915ea81 100644 > --- a/src/Makefile.am > +++ b/src/Makefile.am > @@ -361,7 +361,6 @@ su_LDADD += $(LIB_CRYPT) > > # for various ACL functions > copy_LDADD += $(LIB_ACL) > -dir_LDADD += $(LIB_ACL) Yes, that looks fine. Thanks.
