> I still feel the regex approach offers more flexibility. How about we adopt > the () approach you mentioned below such that: > > gtags --language-force=cpp\:project/include > > Is a real path as you suggest and: > > gtags --language-force=cpp\:([Ii]nclude)
In what kind of case is this useful? If possible, would you please show me an example? > > is a regex pattern contained in (). ... > This would also be consistent with ctags. In ctags's langmap, the pattern is glob pattern not regex. Regards, Shigio -- Shigio YAMAGUCHI <shi...@gnu.org> PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
_______________________________________________ Bug-global mailing list Bug-global@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
