On 8/20/07, Peter Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why does gnu *almost* always recommend to take a double. I have noticed > after playing literally hundreds of games against gnu that 99% of the > time it recommends to take a double it is just plain WRONG! besides why > would gnu offer a double if the odds weren't greatly in its favor to > win??? here is just one example: >
If you have some precise data we can evaluate what you mean by "almost". I can hazard a guess that since gnubg generally doubles earlier than humans (i.e. is less likely to double late) you have more takes against it than you normally have. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
