Michael Petch <[email protected]> wrote on 30/03/2009 16:30:24:
>
> On 30/03/09 8:14 AM, "Massimiliano Maini"
<[email protected]
> > wrote:
> 2. I'm not sure gnubg uses 2ply for luck evaluation. If it uses 0
> ply (as I remember,
> but I could be wrong, mabe it is 0ply just for match analysis luck
> evals), introducing
> your trick would cost something in terms of speed (actually, quite a
> lot I would say,
> knowing that each additional ply cost more or less a factor 21). If
> somebody on gnubg
> mailing list can confirm that ....
>
>
> By default luck is analyzed at 0 ply. You can set the plies manually
with:
> set analysis luckanalysis plies <plies>
Right, but is this setting acting only on the luck analysis (the luck
adjusted
result you see in the stats of an analyzed metch/session) or also on the
variance
reduction algorithm ?
MaX.
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg