Michael Petch <[email protected]> wrote on 30/03/2009 16:30:24:

> 
> On 30/03/09 8:14 AM, "Massimiliano Maini" 
<[email protected]
> > wrote:

> 2. I'm not sure gnubg uses 2ply for luck evaluation. If it uses 0 
> ply (as I remember, 
> but I could be wrong, mabe it is 0ply just for match analysis luck 
> evals), introducing 
> your trick would cost something in terms of speed (actually, quite a
> lot I would say, 
> knowing that each additional ply cost more or less a factor 21). If 
> somebody on gnubg 
> mailing list can confirm that .... 
> 
> 
> By default luck is analyzed at 0 ply. You can set the plies manually 
with: 
> set analysis luckanalysis plies <plies> 

Right, but is this setting acting only on the luck analysis (the luck 
adjusted
result you see in the stats of an analyzed metch/session) or also on the 
variance
reduction algorithm ?

MaX.
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Reply via email to