Without consulting the code I believe that luck-lookahed is used in three places. Analysis (configurable), best-roll-dice (not configurable, 0ply, cubeful?), rollout variance (not configurable, 0ply, used to be cubeless, now cubeful).
Christian. 2009/3/30 Massimiliano Maini <[email protected]>: > > Michael Petch <[email protected]> wrote on 30/03/2009 16:30:24: > >> >> On 30/03/09 8:14 AM, "Massimiliano Maini" <[email protected] >> > wrote: > >> 2. I'm not sure gnubg uses 2ply for luck evaluation. If it uses 0 >> ply (as I remember, >> but I could be wrong, mabe it is 0ply just for match analysis luck >> evals), introducing >> your trick would cost something in terms of speed (actually, quite a >> lot I would say, >> knowing that each additional ply cost more or less a factor 21). If >> somebody on gnubg >> mailing list can confirm that .... >> >> >> By default luck is analyzed at 0 ply. You can set the plies manually with: >> set analysis luckanalysis plies <plies> > > Right, but is this setting acting only on the luck analysis (the luck > adjusted > result you see in the stats of an analyzed metch/session) or also on the > variance > reduction algorithm ? > > MaX. > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg > > _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
