Using a non-sse/sse2 exe on a CPU that supports sse/sse2 has a large impact on performance. Somebody else could confirm but my preliminary tests shows up to 50% (i.e. double the time for an eval).
I can build all kind of exes (with sse2, with sse, without anything) but at the time it's a bit annoying since due to the way the code is structured, I need to recompile everything. On top of that, I have to distribute all the falvors each time I recompile. But that can be handled, with patience :) MaX. 2009/9/4 Michael Depreli <[email protected]>: > We may have found the problem... > > Apparently my Athlon XP 3200 does NOT support SSE2..... > > If true are there gnubg versions without? and if yes in what way will it > affect performance etc? _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
