I¹m getting tired. All the lookaheads in this case will come right from the two sided database and have janowski applied to them (I forgot that we aren¹t in a contact position for a moment brain phart). All the evals should come really fast because of this (even on larger plies). On each lookahead the static evals from the database are reapplied with janowski up to the given ply.
One other thing I¹d like to know. If you take the same position as a money game in XBG can you also post the results. I¹d be curious to see how the values between a XBG¹s money eval and Match eval differ. On 05/09/09 12:38 AM, "Michael Petch" <[email protected]> wrote: > Not necessarily. Interestingly enough on one ply It says double/take but that > based on the potential 21 rolls and their resultant equities (each that will > also have janowski applied). It also assumes the cube is seen within the plies > that are given. > > I have a question for you. On simple 0 ply what are XBG¹s results? Would you > post them. I¹d be curious. > > On 05/09/09 12:11 AM, "Neil Robins" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Surely, therefore, at least 1-ply or higher should see the recube and the >> then dead cube situation and go to the DB for an exact valid value. > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
