Re: [Bug-gnubg] How many threads can gnubg (reliably) handle?

Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:04:56 -0700 


On 11/09/09 5:29 PM, "Michael Petch" <[email protected]> wrote:

> 11000 seconds vs 6265 (I ran the trial a few times to make sure
> the numbers were reproducible over a few hours and to verify the output was
> the same.

I was testing No Cache and 21mb cache in this test at 4ply/4ply. Sorry to
not mention that! 

Tonight I was going to run it it with (2^24) cache entries. I *think* this
coincide with the largest cache size you can have on 32 bit windows with a
32 bit build. If someone has a 32 bit windows system and a 64 bit windows
system and running GnuBG I'd be curious to know if this is true

Michael




_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg























					Reply via email to