On 26 September 2011 23:19, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > But a patch for both modules that references the other may indeed be > worthwhile.
Great, I'll write something (and I find your arguments convincing). At the moment the short descriptions in the module files are identical, which is confusing. The consensus seems to be that linebuffer is easier to use and possibly more flexible. (BTW, getline *is* a GNU interface, just one that happened to be standardized, at least, according to the man page.) -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
