Sure - if you want to come up with your own definition of free software it can be whatever you want. People have come up with their own definitions before: There's "Debian free" and "Fedora free", for example, so that would be nothing new. However, a program with a requirement of being distributed non-commercially wouldn't be "FSF free" which is the point I was trying to make when the original recommendation was made that people on Windows simply download & use Firefox instead. Recommending that they use a program that isn't "FSF free" is probably not a good idea.
-- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
