I suppose that GnuZilla is licensed with the same license as Mozilla (MPL); am I right?
Al 13/05/13 18:38, En/na Jason Self ha escrit: > Sure - if you want to come up with your own definition of free > software it can be whatever you want. People have come up with their > own definitions before: There's "Debian free" and "Fedora free", for > example, so that would be nothing new. However, a program with a > requirement of being distributed non-commercially wouldn't be "FSF > free" which is the point I was trying to make when the original > recommendation was made that people on Windows simply download & use > Firefox instead. Recommending that they use a program that isn't "FSF > free" is probably not a good idea. > > > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
