Follow-up Comment #3, bug #60571 (project groff):
[comment #2 comment #2:]
> The following remain.
And of those. Heirloom uses
; @ j J P T U
> I think before long we want to propose to the *roff community
> the reservation of one of the above characters for an extended
> escape syntax of much the same form as \D and \X.
That makes a great deal of sense to me.
Offhand, < seems the best candidate for a double-agent escape character /
begin delimiter, since it has an obvious companion for an end delimiter (at
the risk of maybe making roff code look a little HTMLy).
> none of the symbols in the above list have any obvious mnemonic
> value to me for the purpose the Heirloom bug submitter and I want.
Given the paucity of available letters, we may be in the Post-Mnemonic Era for
assigning new roff escapes. Traditional Unix commands with a multitude of
single-letter command-line switches have felt this crunch as well.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60571>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
