Follow-up Comment #24, bug #55081 (project groff):
[comment #23 comment #23:] > I can confirm that commit fa5fa889 <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/commit/?id=fa5fa889> solves the problem I saw in comment #14 when the document's footnotes are removed. So the behavior of Bjarni's .wh-containing document is the only open question. Hi Dave, I would fully expect a `wh`-using document to run into problems. As you note in comment #22, "[Bjarni's document] uses .wh to plant a trap, and .wh is not on -me's approved list of low-level roff requests." In fact I reckon it is one of the most dangerous ones a me(7) document author can employ. Unless someone comes up with additional facts bearing on the use of unusual page lengths and multi-column mode _without_ using footnotes or custom vertical position traps, I think this ticket can remain closed as invalid. One could argue that me(7) should redefine `wh` and use a renamed version of it internally, but I'll let that argument be made in a different ticket if it is to be raised. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55081> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
