Follow-up Comment #4, bug #67657 (group groff): At 2025-12-13T16:24:17-0500, Dave wrote: > The only changes to non-current NEWS I _remembered_ seeing (admittedly > an incomplete record) were to aid clarity or correctness of existing > items. To me, that didn't extrapolate to adding content.
Fair.
> But if you're willing, sure, why not...
If it seems to make a difference to our users, yes. I don't think
that's yet been established in the instant case, thought.
>> if we neglected to do so at the time, _and_
>> the issue seems important.
>>
>> I'm not sure that's true of the hdtbl package's support for
>> "dvi" and "pdf" output devices.
>
> ...if this criterion is met.
Right.
>> But I also don't see any evidence that that "support" has been
>> rigorously evaluated.
>
> "Rigor" and "hdtbl" seem to have never met, and it was NEWSed
> previously without this criterion, so that shouldn't be an obstacle
> now.
Perhaps I am more cruel and demanding than past maintainers... 😈
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67657>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
