Your message dated 20 Oct 2000 22:07:09 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in grub 0.5.96.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2000 17:08:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 12 12:08:34 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 212186010174.11.tuwien.teleweb.at (orcus.priv.at)
[::ffff:212.186.10.174]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13jlqM-0002Nv-00; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:08:34 -0500
Received: by orcus.priv.at (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 16F22F015; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 19:08:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: grub: mem= passing broke recently
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 19:08:31 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: grub
Version: 0.5.96
Severity: important
Since upgrading to the newest grub package my linux kernel thinks the
machine has only 64M of memory.
'displaymem' shows the right values (639K low 129984K high memory).
The motherboard is a FIC SD11 with Amibios.
Adding an explicit "mem=128M" to the kernel commandline works. Using
the new "--no-mem-option" does not work. Booting from an old 0.5.93.1
bootdisk (without giving an explicit mem=) works.
I tried with linux 2.2.16 and 2.2.17 with no perceived difference.
(Flagged important since it degrades system performance in a serious
but non-obvious way. It took my a while to notice that the new
sluggishness was not due to bloating apps but due to shrinking memory.)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 74618-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2000 04:08:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 20 23:08:10 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from static204-83-206-163.reverse.accesscomm.ca (trick.fig.org)
[::ffff:204.83.206.163]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13mpx4-00046g-00; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 23:08:10 -0500
Received: from ip216-174-145-19.evenfaster.accesscomm.ca (faust.fig.org)
[216.174.145.19]
by trick.fig.org with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 13mpwy-0007I0-00; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 22:08:04 -0600
Received: from gord by faust.fig.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 13mpw5-00012L-00; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 22:07:09 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in grub 0.5.96.1
X-Attribution: Gord
From: Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 20 Oct 2000 22:07:09 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ I'm a FIG (http://fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
_______________________________________________
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
