"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The consequences will be: > * The CVS module "pupa" will be "grub2" in the GRUB's CVS repository, > * We will use bug-grub instead of pupa-dev for general discussion, > * And, we will set up a web page about GRUB2 in the GRUB's web site.
IMHO this is a good thing to do. This will make it clear to people that PUPA is GRUB and what will happen to GRUB in the future, etc. > I'm not sure if it is a good idea to use bug-grub for GRUB2. What do you > think? Is it better to create another mailing list? I sometimes feel that > bug-grub is used for too many different purposes. Well, I think the biggest problem isn't that PUPA and GRUB are discussed on one mailing list. The biggest problem is that requests for help are send to bug-grub. For the Hurd there are multiple mailing lists: bug-hurd, help-hurd and hurd-devel. Perhaps you could use something similar for GRUB. I think having separate mailing lists is not practical because many discussions on pupa-devel are interesting for people on bug-grub too. Thanks, Marco _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
