On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 15:05, cr wrote: > On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 08:23, Marco Gerards wrote: > > "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The consequences will be: > > > * The CVS module "pupa" will be "grub2" in the GRUB's CVS repository, > > > * We will use bug-grub instead of pupa-dev for general discussion, > > > * And, we will set up a web page about GRUB2 in the GRUB's web site. > > > > IMHO this is a good thing to do. This will make it clear to people > > that PUPA is GRUB and what will happen to GRUB in the future, etc. > > > > > I'm not sure if it is a good idea to use bug-grub for GRUB2. What do > > > you think? Is it better to create another mailing list? I sometimes > > > feel that bug-grub is used for too many different purposes. > > > > Well, I think the biggest problem isn't that PUPA and GRUB are > > discussed on one mailing list. The biggest problem is that requests > > for help are send to bug-grub. > > I agree. I'd like to see a 'grub-help' or a 'grub-user' list to ask GRUB > questions on. As it is they feel kinda out of place on Bug-Grub. > > cr
But (replying to myself), since the traffic is fairly light, one combined list is not a bad idea, as at present. Maybe, as someone suggested, a more 'general' name than 'bug-grub' - maybe just 'grub' - would make the list seem more 'user-friendly' for useres' questions. cr _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
