On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Sami Kerola <[email protected]> wrote: ...
Not a maintainer, but I approve :-) > diff --git a/README b/README > index c2740ea..808413b 100644 > --- a/README > +++ b/README > @@ -41,6 +41,22 @@ Bug reports: > - unusual options you gave to configure, if any (see config.status). > - anything else that you think would be helpful. > > +Patching process: > +- All changes must be sent to mailing list. > +- Changes are reviewed by maintainers. > +- Maintainer does not review own changes. > + * In case of single maintainer, or unresponsive co-maintainer, mailing > + list subscribers does the review. s/does/may perform/ > +- Review means either a patch approval, comments to author, or a reject. > + * Approved patches are taken to upstream git. > + * Commented patches will require work before they can be approved. > + Comments can be untechnical, such as a change author must submit a > + copyright assignment to FSF. > + * Authors are encouraged to discontinue work with rejected changes, as > + the reject is permanent. > +- Maintainers keep track of rejected changes so that developers can avoid > + proposing the same in future. ...
