On 11 January 2014 23:22, Reuben Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 January 2014 23:20, Karl Berry <[email protected]> wrote: >> Maybe the question is if the use of gnulib module version-etc-fsf >> should be recommended or not. >> >> FWIW, I don't use it, even though I maintain a FSF-copyrighted packages >> (Texinfo), because when I tried it wanted to force too much on me -- >> sorry, don't recall specifics now. That is why I didn't use it in >> Hello, either. >> >> Also, most (purely numerically speaking) GNU packages are not >> copyright FSF. >> >> I am in favor recommending unified look & style of --help >> >> Sure, but I am also in favor of not redundantly specifying program >> names. > > > (My point was that I don't think the version-etc-fsf module does force you > to be redundant.)
Hi Reuben & Karl, The discussion left me to feel only right thing to do is to drop the change. If version-etc-fsf is in future seen to be something FSF projects should use the the change can be reintroduced. Rest of the changes were pushed to git moment ago. -- Sami Kerola http://www.iki.fi/kerolasa/
