On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:58:13AM -0300, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Richard Braun, le Wed 04 Jul 2012 08:22:13 +0200, a écrit :
> > It's also quite a lot of heap too, and every 5 seconds. We should
> > consider increasing the interval between global syncs to reduce the
> > impact of this potentially heavy operation.
> It would increase the amount of work you loose on crash. Did you measure
> the CPU use that you get with a typical filesystem, by e.g. touching a
> file every 4 seconds to trigger the sync all the time?


> I guess the real fix would be to be better at knowing which inodes need
> to be recorded, and filter on that.

Yes, hence the comment in my patch, but I leave that as an exercice for
another motivated hacker.

Richard Braun

Reply via email to