> Are there any other way to "hang" a program of Hurd without create a translator? Excuse me. My idea is to raise this program from Hurd (with "hang" I'm not referring to "crash")
El lun., 20 abr. 2020 a las 19:58, Almudena Garcia (< liberamenso10...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > Telling the kernel how it should behave does not have to be done by a > > translator, it can be a mere program as well. > > But, how can I run this program automatically in the system boot? > If I run the program as a service (sysvinit service), this can be > dependant of the distribution (in this case, Debian), is not? > And this approach doesn't seems very secure. > > Are there any other way to "hang" a program of Hurd without create a > translator? > > El lun., 20 abr. 2020 a las 19:44, Samuel Thibault (< > samuel.thiba...@gnu.org>) escribió: > >> Almudena Garcia, le lun. 20 avril 2020 19:41:07 +0200, a ecrit: >> > > Can't the parsing be done in userland (like we do for shutdown), and >> > > just hand over the information to the kernel? >> > >> > Really, this is my idea. As this way, we can avoid the dirty addressing >> > currently used, and solve this task with a hurdish approach. >> >> "Hurdish" doesn't necessarily mean "overly complex" :) >> >> Telling the kernel how it should behave does not have to be done by a >> translator, it can be a mere program as well. >> >> Samuel >> >>
