"Alfred M. Szmidt" <a...@gnu.org> writes: > What would people say about moving things over to codeberg? Savannah > is entierly unusable, and the FSF admins are not interesting in doing > anything.
I consider codeberg for some projects. I have many projects that are dual savannah + gitlab (to get to functionality that doesn't really work on savannah). It is a really time consuming task to switch or maintain both systems, so I sometimes wish I didn't do it, but the end results are rewarding. It is also not crystal clear exactly which features to use from which site, and for different projects (libidn, libidn2, oath-toolkit, gsasl etc) I ended up with different trade-offs. I dislike the confrontational approach to MOVE things from savannah, but I see no problem having additional "inetutils" projects on any other site if there is anyone using that site who is interested in helping inetutils, and if there are any useful result for the inetutils from being on that site. This can be gitlab (like we use for CI/CD which to me is critical to have any confidence of the release tarballs), codeberg, github or whatever. Maybe we can experiment with a codeberg git repo for inetutils, and see if any useful contributions come that way, and could be merged back to savannah manually? I started the project below and pushed savannah's master branch both as 'main' (which I reckon is the codeberg-preferred branch name) and 'master': https://codeberg.org/inetutils/inetutils I started a separate git repo to experiment with Codeberg Forgejo CI/CD rules for InetUtils. Let's see if we can keep CI/CD rules outside of the core InetUtils project until we get some experience with it: https://codeberg.org/inetutils/cicd Compare the gitlab CI/CD inetutils project https://gitlab.com/gsasl/inetutils/-/pipelines which uses this CI/CD rule file: https://gitlab.com/gnulib/pipeline/-/blob/main/gnu/inetutils.yml?ref_type=heads Or the github inetutils CI/CD project, which I've sadly not had any time at all to look into: https://github.com/gnu-inetutils/ci-check If anyone wants to propose a 'Pull Request' on codeberg for this inetutils repo, we could experiment with this workflow a bit. I wouldn't consider this any official action, and I don't speak for the InetUtils project, this is just a toy experiment to learn. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
