Simon Josefsson via Bug reports for the GNU Internet utilities <bug-inetutils@gnu.org> writes:
> "Alfred M. Szmidt" <a...@gnu.org> writes: > >> What would people say about moving things over to codeberg? Savannah >> is entierly unusable, and the FSF admins are not interesting in doing >> anything. The downtime was getting quite annoying, I agree. But it seems to have improved recently (thanks FSF sysadmins and volunteer savannah hackers). Since Codeberg is run by a non-profit and uses Forgejo, free software, it seems like a reasonable backup if things start to change in the wrong direction. We can experiment with it, thanks for setting things up Simon. > I dislike the confrontational approach to MOVE things from savannah, but > I see no problem having additional "inetutils" projects on any other > site if there is anyone using that site who is interested in helping > inetutils, and if there are any useful result for the inetutils from > being on that site. This can be gitlab (like we use for CI/CD which to > me is critical to have any confidence of the release tarballs), > codeberg, github or whatever. That is the method I like as well. > Or the github inetutils CI/CD project, which I've sadly not had any time > at all to look into: https://github.com/gnu-inetutils/ci-check I recall looking into it a while ago. I think all the test failures are 'hostname.sh', which fails in a mostly harmless way. But I couldn't think of a quick fix at the time. Collin
