Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joe Neeman escreveu: >> On Saturday 01 September 2007 09:00, Trevor Bača wrote: >>> On 8/31/07, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> On Friday 31 August 2007 23:17, Trevor Bača wrote: >>>>> Should I send the inputfile to either Joe or Han-Wen for testing >>>>> against .31? >>>> I'd be happy to take a look at it. >>> Thank you *so* much, Joe! Will send offlist ... >> >> I can't reproduce with git or the x86-linux binary. >> I get a segfault with the amd64 binary... in ghostscript (during the >> convert-to-pdf stage). If I take the .ps file and run it though the system's >> ghostscript, it works perfectly. So it seems to be a problem with the >> ghostscript that's included in the binary package. > > In the original report, it didn't crash in GS but in lily. > It looks as if someone needs to build a macos binary without > stripping.
I have such a beast here, maybe Trevor could send me his failing file. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
