On 9/2/07, Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Joe Neeman escreveu: > >> On Saturday 01 September 2007 09:00, Trevor Bača wrote: > >>> On 8/31/07, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> On Friday 31 August 2007 23:17, Trevor Bača wrote: > >>>>> Should I send the inputfile to either Joe or Han-Wen for testing > >>>>> against .31? > >>>> I'd be happy to take a look at it. > >>> Thank you *so* much, Joe! Will send offlist ... > >> > >> I can't reproduce with git or the x86-linux binary. > >> I get a segfault with the amd64 binary... in ghostscript (during the > >> convert-to-pdf stage). If I take the .ps file and run it though the > >> system's > >> ghostscript, it works perfectly. So it seems to be a problem with the > >> ghostscript that's included in the binary package. > > > > In the original report, it didn't crash in GS but in lily. > > It looks as if someone needs to build a macos binary without > > stripping. > > I have such a beast here, maybe Trevor could send me his failing file.
Excellent! I'll send you the file offlist in just a second ... and you can feed it to the beast ;-) -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
