Valentin Villenave <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Neil Puttock <[email protected]> wrote: >> This bug looks like #807, which has a patch pending. > > Indeed. But what about #882 then?
Sounds like somebody should apply the patch and reevaluate all related bugs given their sample code. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
