On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:15:45AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Valentin Villenave <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Neil Puttock <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This bug looks like #807, which has a patch pending. > > > > Indeed. But what about #882 then? > > Sounds like somebody should apply the patch and reevaluate all related > bugs given their sample code.
I think we could figure that out by ourselves. Unless you're volunteering to do this testing, pointing this out only serves to aggravate developers. - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
